Salem Witchcraft, Disability, and Agatha All Along

I have a love/hate relationship with the Salem Witch Trials in pop culture.  Sometimes, the 1692 trials appear in an appropriate context albeit littered with inaccuracies, like Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, and sometimes it’s just terrible, like WGN America’s Salem.  Marvel is a bit of a mixed bag since the 1976 comic with Spider-Man fighting Rev. Cotton Mather is a hilarious concept but historically extremely wrong.  The new series Agatha All Along has some history sins related to Salem, but I also find one of the plot devices incredibly fascinating in a historical context.  A key plot point (as of episode 4) is a sigil to stop the character Teen, played by Joe Locke, from revealing his identity to Agatha, portrayed by Kathryn Hahn.  Whenever Teen discusses his name and background, Agatha and the other witches are unable to hear it.  In some instances, Teen speaks, and a sigil covers his mouth with a W or M.  In another scene, Teen discusses his background, and Agatha cannot hear his voice while other sounds are clear.  This sort of sensory bewitchment during the Salem Witchcraft Trials is a significant part of my dissertation research.

Agatha Harkness (Kathryn Hahn) and Teen (Joe Locke) showing the sigil appearing over Teen’s mouth. Source: https://screenrant.com/how-agatha-all-along-connects-mcu/

The show’s context: There is a character named Teen who sought out the witch Agatha Harkness to go down the Witches’ Road.  Teen is an unnamed teenager and his parentage, background, supernatural abilities, etc are all questions that will presumably be answered over the season (yes, I have seen the fan theories).  Agatha initially asked Teen for his name, and the sigil appeared over his mouth.  Later, Teen discussed his background in the car with Agatha who sees that Teen is speaking but cannot hear him despite hearing music from the car’s radio.  In the third episode, the group of witches ask for Teen’s name and the mysterious letter covered his mouth again, preventing all of them from hearing it.

Early American Disability context: Historical disability is a tricky subject since our contemporary understanding of disability, as a collective term for various kinds of bodies and embodiments, does not have a direct parallel in the early modern period.  People with disabilities of all sorts have always existed, but the societal and environmental constructs that determine disability change.  To study historical disability, I look for moments where a body is treated as, discussed as, or indicated as physically, cognitively, or sensorially different.  In all time periods, there are imaginary expectations of an able body, and while no body is perfectly able in all ways, certain bodily conditions are considered deviations from this imagined norm and socially constructed as disability.  For example, in the modern day, most people do not think of wearing glasses as a disability.  This is contextual for someone with the healthcare and socioeconomic position to visit an optometrist and purchase glasses, but in the zeitgeist, glasses are not really treated as a social barrier.  In a different period, the same visual condition might not have an easily accessible form glasses, and therefore societal expectations about vision, such as ability to read or travel via visual cues, would be a disability and treated as such.  It could also be that a person ages into a disability and loses their vision over their time.  An act could occur where a person loses eyesight, or a medical procedure could restore eyesight, meaning their disability status changes.  The long story short here is that disability is extremely contextual, and so I look at how forms of bodily and embodied difference effect historical actors, rather than seek out historical actors who identify as disabled or identify with a disability aligned with a modern parallel.

The Trial of George Jacobs painted by T. H. Matteson

Throughout the Salem Witch Trials, accusers utilized temporary disabilities to make accusations of witchcraft.  Frequently, accusers claimed sensory afflictions prevented the accusers from providing testimony, but it also posed a threat.  When Susannah Sheldon testified against several accused suspects, she said “they made me deaf and dumb and blind all night” as part of their supernatural harm to encourage Sheldon to sign the devil’s book and surrender her soul.  Elizabeth Reis’ scholarship on gender and the soul discusses how Puritan theology included expectations that a strong body protected the soul, and Satan sent witches to harm physical bodies to force the submission of an individual’s supernatural soul.  In short, witches harmed the body before harming the soul, but the body also served as an intermediary for the soul’s religious experience in the physical world.  People listened to sermons, spoke prayers, and read the Bible, meaning sensory disability cut off the soul from religious participation.  Witchcraft afflictions preyed upon this interplay between the visible world and invisible world, between the body and soul, through disability.  Throughout the witch trials, this understanding of disability consistently shaped the course of events.

A 19th century depiction of Tituba

Tituba’s confession was one of the clearest influences of disability.  The first accusations in February resulted in three arrests.  Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, and Tituba are often called “the likely suspects” as women whose social standings and reputations made them easier targets to the Puritan witch hunters.  Good, a beggar; Osborne, a woman with a scandalous past; and Tituba, an enslaved Indigenous woman, represented threats to Puritan social hierarchy that prized evidence of God’s blessings, like wealth; strict morals, ability, and whiteness.  When the accusers named these women, they (or their parents) probably knew the accusations were believable.  Early successful accusations would likely lead to opportunities to name more suspects; a slew of historiography discusses the various motivations that could have been at play.  On March 1, 1692, the three women appeared before magistrates for examinations where Good and Osborne denied the charges.  Tituba confessed.

Tituba’s confession affirmed the accusations, and she also named Good and Osborne as fellow conspirators with Satan.  Within the confession, Tituba executed careful control of the narrative of her confession and disability.  She discussed how the devil appeared to her, how Good and Osborne forced her to harm the accusing children, and she said others already signed the devil’s book, meaning the authorities could pursue more witches.  Rev. John Hale of a neighboring town described that Tituba’s credibility partially came from her recollection of answers and that “She became a sufferer herself.”  Tituba experienced afflictions during her confession and as the magistrates questioned her.  She described that Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne attacked her, and their specters “would not let her see & after that [she] was once or twice taken dumb herself.”  Tituba lost both her speech and sight during her confession.  Her credibility came from repeating answers and experiencing disability, but when properly executed, her moments of temporary disability occurred according to the questions that Tituba did or did not want to answer.  She decided when to reply to the magistrates.  The transcript of her examination ended after she lost her physical senses, like speech.

A 19th century image titled The Witch of Salem

In another example, after Samuel Wardwell was found guilty by the Court of Oyer and Terminer, Wardwell spoke to proclaim his innocence ahead of his execution.  However, as he protested his conviction, reports say that smoke from the executioner’s tobacco pope blew into Wardwell’s face and interrupted his speech.  According to Robert Calef’s critical account of the trials, “those accusers said, the Devil [hindered] him with smoke.”  During the examination of Rebecca Nurse, Rev. Deodat Lawson reported that “The afflicted persons said, the Black Man [the Devil], whispered to her in the Assembly, and therefore she could not hear what the Magistrates said unto her.”  In both instances, a supernatural force exerted power over a person’s physical senses.  For Wardwell and Nurse, these moments proved their affiliation with Satan while court authorities used Tituba’s loses of speech and sight to prove the veracity of her confession.  A fluid interpretation of disability that benefited the accusations was a throughline of the entire witchcraft crisis.

 Agatha All Along uses this same theme of witchcraft and sensory disability- in both Teen’s inability to audibly speak or Agatha’s ability to hear him speak.  I don’t know if the Marvel Universe knowingly drew on historical forms of witchcraft afflictions to influence the senses, but it references a history of disability and witchcraft.  As much as Agatha’s relationship with the Salem Seven commits many historical sins, the sigil as a form of disabling bewitchment is an accurate portrayal of how witches were alleged to harm victims.  It also speaks to the history of ablism that tied certain embodied differences to the devil and framed disability as moral judgement.  Teen shows the historical beliefs, but how the sigil further plays out and whether it offers a critique to ablism in witchcraft remains to be seen.  My dissertation work digs deeper into the Salem Witch Trials, Puritanism, and disability history with a much longer discussion on Rebecca Nurse and her accusers, so wait a few months for final chapter drafts.

Select Bibliography

For the Salem court records, see salem.lib.virginia.edu

“He that Hath an Ear to Hear”: Deaf America and the Second Great Awakening” by Sari Altschuler, Disability Studies Quarterly Vol. 31 No. 1

More Wonders of the Invisible World by Robert Calef

A Modest Enquiry into the Nature of Witchcraft by Rev. John Hale

Damned Women: Sinners and Witch in Puritan New England by Elizabeth Reis

Disability Theory by Tobin Seibers

The 2024 Election on r/AskHistorians: June 29-July 21

I study 17th century New England with a focus on the Salem Witch Trials.  During the Trump administration, every Tweet that he sent with the words “witch hunt” caused me to groan.  I worked as a docent in Salem, MA, and often heard tourists comment on the history of the 1692 witch hunt and the president.  For years, anytime I met new people, whether it was at a birthday party or a wedding, being introduced by friends and family as “the Salem Witch Trials guy” meant there were follow up questions about Trump.  I cannot emphasize enough how disgraceful the former president’s conflation of scapegoating and accountability is to the memory of the victims of Salem and other injustices.  These exchanges happened so often that I knew my routine and what points to hit each time.  I started thinking about how history and current events work together.  Now as a moderator of AskHistorians, I see this phenomenon everyday and it sparked a side research project that I wanted to share more about here.  I make no promises of turning this into an ongoing series throughout the entire 2024 election, but I’ll try to post updates.

The subreddit AskHistorians, a text-based Q&A forum with over 2 million subscribers on Reddit, bans the discussion of current events.  Users often circumvent this rule by asking about historical topics that echo the present.  The rules explicitly state that questions must focus on events that are at least twenty years old, and any violating post is removed with suggestions of other subreddits to try instead.  However, asking a question about the past does not occur in a vacuum.  As E. H. Carr wrote, “we can view the past, and achieve our understanding of the past, only through the eyes of the present.”  As a moderator of this community, I’ve seen the influxes of questions related to major news stories.  Sometimes there are explicit references.  For example, this question asked about examples of military withdrawals and mentioned news coverage of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan.  Other questions aren’t explicitly tied to current events but correlate strongly with media coverage, like this question on Afghan pastimes under the Taliban the same day as the New York Times ran a story on the American exit strategy from Afghanistan.  I recently recorded a panel on AskHistorians for the upcoming DH 2024 conference where I presented a paper on this phenomenon.  While preparing for it, I thought about how the U.S. election is already a prominent topic of historical questions and wanted to show what’s happening on Reddit, the so-called “front page of the Internet.”  The relationship between current events and historical questions on r/AskHistorians shows both the relevance of history and the public’s interest in connecting the past and present.  After the past month of election news, there is a clear need for historians to intertwine their knowledge with the political events of the day.

For those unfamiliar with Reddit and r/AskHistorians, Reddit is a social media site made of disparate communities called subreddits. Each subreddit is dedicated to its own unique topic or content format with its own rules about user created post submissions and comments.  Users subscribe to communities which is algorithmically sorted to an individual feed, or their own personal front page.  Reddit also has its own front page, or r/all, where trending topics across the site are presented.  AskHistorians is a question-and-answer forum for questions about history.  The moderators require that comments provide in-depth and comprehensive answers to posts and remove answers that do not meet this standard.  Answers must show that the user has subject matter expertise but does not require academic credentials.  As a result, many questions go unanswered, but users may repost their inquiries.  AskHistorians also has a podcast, an AskMeAnything series, and recommended resources.  Additionally, the Sunday Digest and newsletter provide collected links of answered questions.

Posts are approved by moderators according to the AskHistorians rules.  These rules prohibit bigotry, soapboxing, polls, hypotheticals, and discussion of current events.  Answers must also follow these rules and provide accurate and comprehensive responses to these questions.  By asking about historical events, users react to current events and seek context for the world around them without violating the AskHistorians policy that questions cover topics twenty or more years old.  Posts that are overly focused on current events or would encourage a debate over modern politics are removed, but references to events or news stories to contextualize or frame a historical question is perfectly fine and allowed according to the rules.  For example, a post asking, “How does the Biden campaign compare to past incumbent presidential campaigns?” would break the rules by depending on discussion about the 2024 Biden campaign- come back in 2044.  But an allowed post might be titled “Did incumbency help 19th century US presidents win reelection?” with explanatory text saying, “I keep hearing President Biden has an incumbency advantage, but I want to know if this is historically an advantage for reelection?” Acceptable questions might can be less explicit, such as “Did past U.S. Presidents run for reelection with low poll numbers? How did their campaigns deal with being unpopular?”  All three draw on modern politics, but the latter two ask about historical events.

Four major events this summer already set the tone for the election and appeared on r/AskHistorians in significant ways: President Biden’s June 27th debate fallout, the Trump v. United States immunity decision released on July 1st, the July 13th shooting of former President Donald Trump, and President Biden’s July 21st decision to not seek reelection.  Each of these events appeared on AskHistorians with various questions, and examples for each topic were some of the most popular posts of the day, week, and month.

I would describe these topics as falling into three categories of questions: Contextual Questions, Comparative Questions, and Learn from the Past Questions.  With each of these questions, users are reaching out to the past to understand the 2024 election, and they serve various purposes.

Contextual Questions seek historical information that helps to explain something.  These questions might ask why something occurred in the past or ask about change over time.  On occasion these posts will take a format like “how did we get here?” For example, on July 1st, a user asked “Why did the US founding fathers opt to have Supreme Court Justices be appointed by Presidents instead of general elections?”  The user even said in their post they were trying to understand the checks and balance system in the U.S. Constitution and wanted to know the intentions and debate over the clauses.  This is not explicitly about Trump case, but the decision to grant immunity to official acts impacts how to understand checks on the Executive Branch, and that impact probably inspired this question.           

Comparative Questions ask about similar events and either make or seek parallels in the past.  As an example, in the fallout of the presidential debate, the media storm surrounding President Biden has relentlessly focused on his cognitive ability and fitness for office.  In the midst of this press frenzy, a user asked “[When] President Reagan was in the white house it was rumored in the second term he already had Alzheimer’s and that his wife pretty much ran the country. Is there any truth to this or was this just something made up?”  President Biden is not directly mentioned, but the question clearly draws on the widespread discourse about cognitive fitness for office.

Learn from the Past Questions look for instances in the past that we can learn from to understand and adapt to the current world.  The colloquialism that “those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it” is present in these posts, and oftentimes users are seeking optimism.  On July 3rd, a user posted “Are there any good examples in history of countries that had a rise in fascist ideology but was halted before full-blow fascism?”  and the post text said “Asking for a friend from another country…”  Subtlety is not Reddit’s strength.   

With each of these question genres, users are reaching out to the past to understand what’s happening in the 2024 election.  For contextual questions, users want to understand how we got to this point, for comparison questions users are curious if anything similar ever happened, and learning questions are trying to understand where we are going.  Each event also represents something uncommon for an American election: President Biden’s debate performance, the assassination attempt, the Supreme Court’s malpractice against the Constitution, and an incumbent dropping out are not wholly unique events but they feel or are treated as unprecedented in modern politics.  There have been bad debates, presidential assassinations, and damaging SCOTUS decisions, but not all occurring in any other recent election.  Historical examples can help clarify and make sense of current events. 

I want to take a look at some of the questions about each event.  Many still need answers, but the posts are still a valuable resource as questions.  I gathered many of the relevant and approved submissions, but these are not comprehensive lists.

On presidential health:

President Wilson Had Stroke In office. Eisenhower Had A Heart Attack. Why Weren’t They Forced Out Of Office?

When William Henry Harrison was running for president, how much was made of his age? Were there concerns about his mental capacity, his likelihood of dying in office, or being out of touch with the youths?

Did FDR’s declining health lead to any poor leadership or bad decisions while he was still alive? How was it treated by his advisors and staff?

How did the public perceive FDR’s illness/disability during his presidency and elections, and how did it affect his campaigns?

This set of questions, including the Reagan Alzheimer’s question above, seems to conflict with the media narrative regarding how important this topic is, or was prior to July 21st, to the electorate.  These questions are asking if a president’s health has ever mattered, and the tone of the Wilson and FDR questions ask if there is a significant effect to the presidency. The subject matter is not how past presidents, or other world leaders for that matter, were forced to vacate their office or campaign due to their health; the subject is ‘has anyone cared about it before.’  There is plenty for historians to discuss about the historical reality of presidential age, health, and campaigns, but these questions indicate a perception that media scrutiny over President Biden’s physical and mental condition is an outlier in presidential history.

On assassinations:

Did comedians make jokes about the Reagan assassination attempt?

Between 1963 when JFK was assassinated and 1968 when RFK was assassinated what security changes had been implemented for high-profile individuals?

How did Joh Hinckley Jr. avoid being killed immediately after attempting to assassinate president Reagan?

Did the assassination attempt of Ronald Reagan help bolster his reelection campaign?

The assassination questions surprised me with the historical content that appeared: certain assassinations/attempts were asked about, but not all, and not Abraham Lincoln’s assassination.  It isn’t wholly surprising that the assassinations of James Garfield or William McKinley are overlooked on AskHistorians this month, they tend to receive less attention in general as well as other attempted assassinations like against FDR or Gerald Ford.  The attempt against Reagan seems the most comparable as the most recent failed attempt which also fits into a metanarrative of the Republican party identity.  But no Abe Lincoln questions?  No John Wilkes Booth?  There may be a recency bias in what questions AskHistorians receives, but it struck me as odd.

The main thing I notice about these questions is that none of them asked for motivation.  Why did John Hinckley Jr. or Lee Harvey Oswald do it?  It’s a valid historical question, but in the wake of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, that’s not this historical question users are curious about.  Instead, users asked about reactions.  How did comedians react? How did the Secret Service respond? How did the public feel?  These are not questions about why political assassinations occur, but rather how do people respond, and therefore how do we respond today?  Is a joke by a comedian appropriate? Do law enforcement agencies fix problems? Will this affect how people vote?  Maybe this is why there is no Lincoln question: responding to an assassination attempt in 1981 makes more sense than 1865.  These are questions for 2024.

On stepping aside:

Biden has had a lot of pressure from Democrats to resign, did LBJ get the same?

Was it a shock when Lyndon B Johnson decided to not run for a second term? Was his decision expected?

Was Washington’s resignation a surprise, and did the 1796 U.S. election campaign all happen in the 46 days after Washington published his Farewell Address?

Have any “surprise” candidates ever won a major American election?

The media allusions to LBJ have clearly broken through to the minds of AskHistorians posters since otherwise President Lydon B. Johnson is not the most regular figure on the subreddit but he is mentioned in a lot of the broadcasts as the last incumbent to step aside.  I’m sure within the next week there will be many more questions, but so far it seems to be questions to make sense what happened.  This meme on Twitter captures the feeling of the long 2024 election cycle: 0 days since our last unprecedented event.  These questions are serve that exact purpose, determining how unprecedent current events are.

I saved the Trump vs. United States questions for last because those took a different tone.  In the other three instances, users asked questions that sought to make sense of events.  People are confused and looking to history to understand.  But in the wake of the Supreme Court granting presidential immunity and impacting how Trump will be held accountable for the January 6th Insurrection, the questions on AskHistorians took a different tone: fear.  People aren’t just looking to the past to make sense of the chaos in our political news, they’re looking to the past out of fear of repeating it.  Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, AskHistorians received an influx of questions about Nazi Germany and the rise of fascism.  It was not a subtle trend.

On presidential immunity:

Was there a German equivalent of California as Germany descended into fascism in the 1930’s?

Was There Anything Non-Nazi’s Did To Accelerate Hitler’s Rise To Power In The Early 1930’s?

Were the German population okay with the Enabling Acts of 1933?

After the failed coup attempt of 1923, how long did it take for there to be widespread awareness that Germany was in danger of descending into fascism?

Did Hitler pardon supporters of his that participated in the Beer Hall Putsch when he obtained power?

Is this the first time “American Democracy” has been perceived to be in jeopardy?

This list reads like a flashing red light and blaring sirens.  These are the mental links Redditors are making with our present day and history.

Not every question on AskHistorians receives an answer.  The scary thought to me is that if Reddit is the first or second stop, where do they look next if we don’t reach them?  Probably not our academic books, articles, or conferences.  Reddit can oftentimes be a cesspool, but its one of the places where people go to learn in our digital age.  As a graduate student affiliate at the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media, I’m very familiar with Rosenzweig’s call to “democratize history” by using digital media to reach wider audiences.  Looking at AskHistorians this election cycle, democratizing the past is also part of the fight to protect democracy. This election is making people confused about the present and afraid for the future.  They’re looking to the past to understand.  Are we reaching them?

“In the cold mansions of the silent tomb”: Data, Disability, and New England Gravestones, Part 1

A gravestone and a bar graph with an arrow icon between them

Burial Plots to ggplot

In the summer of 2022, I visited the Massachusetts Historical Society to conduct dissertation research.  The following summer, I returned to Massachusetts with funding from the New England Regional Fellowship Consortium to visit several more archives, including Harvard Divinity School Library, The Phillips Library, The Congregational Library, and a return to MHS.  On both these trips, I used spare time to visit 127 cemeteries in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine.  This series of blog posts will tie some of my findings to the subject of my dissertation project- disability and religion in early America- while discussing how data and digital methods helps to study the topic.  Part 1 will focus on the methodology, Part 2 will look at some early data findings, Part 3 will cover the disability history carved into New England’s gravestones, and Part 4 will tie all these parts together with the Salem Witch Trials.  This series will hopefully turn into Chapter 2 of my dissertation project, Embodied Providence in Early America.

On my first visit to Mass Historical, I looked at the First Church of Boston records which included the Proprietors account book, 1711-1782.  It included a pew map for the new brick meetinghouse from 1715 and above the pulpit sits a winged heart.  I’ll discuss more about hearts in Part 3, but this imagery matters for my topic.  It reminded me of the death’s head motif on early gravestones where a skull sits between two wings.  On the next weekend, I walked from my parents’ house to North Andover’s First Parish Burial Ground and saw the potential for disability history sources in both the imagery and epitaphs.  I visited 40 cemeteries that summer and 87 more the next.  I did not intend to turn this into a data driven project, but as I processed the pictures, I started thinking about the possibilities and formalized the process.

1. Cemetery Trips

A map of Massachusetts and New Hampshire marking the 127 cemeteries visited
A map of all the cemeteries visited to create this dataset

I scouted cemeteries online through Find a Grave and Google Maps street view to look for cemeteries within my time period, the 1660s to 1820s.  I organized routes to visit 5 to 10 cemeteries in a day to cover northern Massachusetts before expanding south to Plymouth, west towards Worcester and across southern New Hampshire, and on a trip with my high school friends I dragged everyone to Old Parish Cemetery in York, Maine.

In future trips up to Massachusetts, I hope to add more cemeteries around Worcester, MA; Manchester, NH; and southern Massachusetts. I also intend to add some Boston area ones such as Dorchester and Charlestown. In the meantime, I’m considering how to use the Farber Gravestone Collection to supplement my data.

2. Photographing

A rusty gate in a stone wall that enters into a cemetery with rows of gravestones in the background
The entrance to North Andover’s First Parish Burying Ground

At each cemetery I walked through each row of stones to look for possible connections to disability history (see part 3), representative samples of carvings as well as unique stones, and family names related to the Salem Witch Trials (see part 4).  In the future, I hope to revisit some of the cemeteries to double check my initial sampling, expand the dataset, and see what new observations stand out on a second walkthrough. I used my twelve-year-old Nikon D40 to take a couple pictures of each stone.  Ultimately, I took about 11,000 photographs of 3,925 stones.  The Nikon’s shutter jammed during my last week and I resorted to using my cell phone.

There were challenges with reading gravestones: many are eroded or covered in moss and therefore illegible.  Other stones are partially buried or in overgrown fields.  I also struggled to photograph stones against extremely persistent swarms of mosquitoes at Lancaster’s Old Burial Ground and rushed through Newburyport’s Sawyer Hill Burial Ground given the foxes running around cemetery. Still, I tried to photograph a reasonable sample even if I decided to skip stones with little hope of deciphering (or that wildlife wanted me to avoid).

As for tech challenges, these photographs require 21.5GB of storage on my laptop.  I did not organize the photographs in a helpful way, so I suggest being more cautious at the start of a project.  All the JPEG files are located in folders based on the date of the cemetery trip rather than separate folders for the cemetery locations.  The latter would make more sense than “Cemeteries May 27th”.  I’ll fix this some day …maybe.

3. Processing

Once I saved all the pictures on my laptop, I loaded them into Tropy, a photo management software designed for researchers.  I added my pictures into a designated project for gravestones.  Since I took multiple photos of stones, I first went through and grouped photos into items. After that sorting, I added the self-evident metadata for each stone: Name, Death Date, Age, Cemetery, and Town. 

Timothy Swan's gravestone showing a face with wings over the inscription
Timothy Swan’s stone in North Andover, MA, carved by John Hartshorne

Death date and age posed a few questions.  Gravestones exist for multiple people, often family stones representing decades.  I used the most recent date given that a carver in 1780 could not inscribe a stone to a person who died in 1800.  There are backdated stones, however.  For example, John Hartshorne carved Timothy Swan’s stone that is dated 1692, but Hartshorne began carving after 1700.  It will result in some outlier datapoints, but for the scope of this project, few stones are so wildly anachronistic to harm the overall findings.  Those outliers when closer examined may also reveal unique information about gravestone carvers through their efforts, or lack of efforts, to match the imagery and the time periods.  I am also less concerned about the integrity of the data from retro-dated stones that were contemporary to the life of the carver: Hartshorne’s first wife, Ruth, was Swan’s sister.  Few retro-dated stones are generations removed from the deceased listed and the carving date.

In a different question, stones representing multiple people were marked for each age.  If a stone represented a husband and wife aged 75 and 80 respectively but they died 10 years apart, the commission and/or purchase of the stone (and therefore its imagery) were still for a 75-year-old and an 80 year old.  The ages are all accounted for, albeit both dated for the latest death year.

This distinct treatments for age and death year matter for the value of the dataset.  The data is not an accurate portrayal of lifespans.  If I wanted to trace lifespans on gravestones, I could organize a metadata system in that manner, but it is not in the scope or interest of the project.  The visual data such as skulls an cherubs, the approximate year of the carving based on death date, and age of the deceased honored with those images are within the scope of my project.  As I analyze various facets of the data, backdated stones, whether purchased later by circumstance or to replace an earlier memorial, will remain in consideration. This makes the dataset valuable for understanding funerary art over time, not colonial American demographics.

4. Visual Metadata

The metadata vocabulary for the artistic elements of the stones posed more problems than the death and age questions.  New England gravestone imagery is often divided into the categories of Death’s Head, Cherub, and Urns as the 3 main motifs that appear.  However, soul effigies, hourglasses, abstract designs, coffins, floral patterns, and more adorn dozens of stones, and often times these images appeared together like a winged hourglass over a cherub or a death’s head flying over a heart. 

I initially decided how to focus on the relevant imagery.  The tympanum, or the top crest of the stone, features the main feature of the gravestone’s design.  The skulls, angels, and urns appear here.  The finials on the shoulders, the rounded sides next to the tympanum, often featured secondary designs like faces, miniature cherubs, and abstract patterns. (See this diagram by the Connecticut Gravestone Network.)  Carvers might also adorn stones with floral and vegetative carvings for additional decoration along the borders.  I chose to focus on the featured designs, meaning the main imagery in the tympanum and finials.  Data is messy and case by case decisions were necessary on occasion.

Given my focus for this project is representations of bodies and souls, I made decisions to look at the relevant motifs.  Otherwise the number of flowers tagged might overwhelm the dataset when these carvings are mostly decorative compared to the theological themes of my dissertation.  Other historians might find meaning in the floral patterns and chose to create that dataset, but I needed to limit the scope of the project somewhere, and these tympanum and finial carvings are the visual focal points for gravestone viewers.

After determining the visual metadata scope, I began to determine the categories of visuals.  Some of it was easy: its an urn, imagery is an urn; it’s a coffin, imagery is a coffin.  Others brought up unusual questions: how fleshy does a face need to look to be a cherub rather than a death’s head?  Is it a face or a soul effigy if it has shoulders?  Do skull require teeth? Ultimately, I expanded the usual notion of death’s head, cherub, and urn to include effigy and face as prominent motifs and compared carvings to each genre to place tricky cases.  In total, I assigned terms to 42 designs, ranging from singular appearances in the dataset to nearly 1,200 urns. I also added a secondary column for the motif to collect wider themes, such as coffins, skulls, and death’s heads as Death which are otherwise separate imagery categories.

5. RStudio

a screenshot of the data spreadsheet in RStudio
Screenshot of the dataset in RStudio

I exported the metadata from Tropy into a CSV file and loaded it into RStudio to start analysis.  Columns like age and imagery included lists of variables inside single cells.  R assumes that data within a cell is a single variable. I used the command separate_rows to split these into multiple rows of data with a single variable.  This left me with 6,574 observations of 10 variables for my 3,925 gravestones. 

I spent some time cleaning up the data by finding errant commas, mistyped imagery labels, and other typos. I fixed these in Tropy and re-exported it.

6. Visualizations

With all the data created, organized, and tidied, I began to visualize it with ggplot2.  Here is one example plot, and more on how data visualizations provide insight into the gravestones and the religious culture of the period will be discussed in Part 2 (coming soon!).

a bar graph of Gravestone Imagery Over Time counting the number of stones in the dataset on the Y axis and the year on the x axis.  It shows Death's heads remaining popular until about 1780.  Cherubs appear in 1750 and peak by 1790. Urns start to appear in 1775 but do not dominate the motifs until 1795
Here you can see the chronological change over time for the three main motifs. While Death’s Heads were popular for a long time, by the 1770s their popularity faded. Cherubs took off in popularity around 1750 until the 1790s. By 1800, Urns dominated the funerary art scene.

What’s Next?

I plan to keep adding gravestones as I go home to New England and find time to visit more cemeteries and revisit others.

I also need to think about the text data gathered on the stones. I tagged the epitaphs and verses written underneath the inscriptions, and hopefully can build a dataset out of these someday. However, this section of the stones is often buried, covered by long grass, and simply unreadable now. There is still a sizeable sample to work with, but creating a clean dataset will take more work than my dissertation allows at this time.

An infographic listing the steps discussed in the blog post

Bibliography

Deetz, James, In Small Things Forgotten: An Archeology of Early American Life
Forbes, Harriette Merrifield, Gravestones of Early New England and the Men Who Made Them, 1653-1800
Ludgwig, Allan, Graven Images: New England Stonecarving and Its Symbols, 1650-1815

A New Salem Witch Trials Document: A 19th c. Transcription of a 1739 Petition

I am spending this summer at several archives with funding from the New England Regional Fellowship Consortium to research for my dissertation on early American disability history.  I am currently at The Phillips Library in Rowley, MA, to look at several collections related to my project and ended up finding something exciting.  Last week I viewed the Towne Family Papers: a collection of documents related to a large and prominent Topsfield, MA, family with contents dating from 1630 to 1928.  Boxes 4 and 5 contained a two-volume scrapbook with family papers from the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries compiled by Edward Stone Towne. 

A large hardcover book in set on an archive's book cradle
Volume II of the Town Family Scrapbook

As I flipped through the books, the contents seemed eclectic: stamp and currency collections, seventeenth century land deeds, hand drawn maps, sermon notebooks, genealogy notes, and more glued to the pages of this massive tome.  Then I found something that stunned me for a moment.  The volumes both go chronologically through the centuries and the piece of paper on this next page was out of place between documents from the 1730s.  Although I’m not an expert on paper or handwriting, I knew this page was most likely from the nineteenth century and therefore not in chronological order.  Then I started to read it to see why Edward Towne changed his organization.

Copy)

I the subscriber being a grandchild and descendant of Sarah Wildes

First page of the John Wildes petition transcript

My heart skipped a beat. Sarah Wildes hanged on July 19, 1692, for the crime of witchcraft. I skimmed over the document to try and figure out what this was and thought it was odd I didn’t recognize it. I started to research the Salem Witch Trials for a high school project in 2011, my undergraduate thesis at GWU was a network analysis of the trials, and my graduate work at GMU has a significant amount of Salem related history.  I just taught a digital history course themed around the trials.  Chapter 1 of my dissertation looks at the role of disability during the witch trials and now my second chapter outline has started to include more of the post-witch trials petitions and historical memory of the descendants.  In other words, I’ve read the court records many times and this document fit the scope of my current research, but why didn’t I recognize it? I just looked at a the family petitions after the witch trials again and a grandchild petitioning for Sarah Wildes didn’t ring a bell. Then I flipped it over.

Pet. of John Wildes 1739

I spent the spring semester assigning my students primary source readings from the UVA Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive and Transcription Project and the documents didn’t really go this far into the eighteenth century.  There are a few outliers but the efforts to receive restitution occurred around 1710.  Not only is this petition much later, I remembered seeing that Sarah’s son Ephraim (John’s father) sought restitution around that time too, so why a second Wildes family petition?  I checked the UVA database to see if this document was listed anywhere.  I search Sarah Wildes’ case file, the index for her son Ephraim, and the only John Wildes listed is in reference to her husband.  Then I asked to look at the reading room’s copy of Rosenthal’s Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt and again, no petition of John Wildes. 

When I went home for the day, I carried on the search.  I checked the UVA database again, followed all the links to other repositories, searched Margo Burns’ website, checked all 34 volumes of the The Historical Collections of the Topsfield Historical Society, and also just searched on Google.  I could not find this document anywhere.  I also reached out to Emerson Baker, a professor at Salem State who I interviewed in 2011 for my high school National History Day project; and Margo Burns, the project manager for Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt.  If anyone knew about this document: it would be either of them.   Baker pointed me towards a late 1730s legislative effort to pay reparations to families impacted by the witch trials as a reason for such a document to exist.  Burns offered points of skepticism: the £100 request is high and also odd given Ephraim Wildes sought and received £14 in 1711, the petition refers to Sarah Wildes’ estate but she wasn’t a widow so the estate wouldn’t be considered Sarah’s, and a number of dramatize/romanticized/fictionalized tales of the witch trials came out of the nineteenth century so it could be made up.  There is no known original document to provide a better context.  In summary, this is an odd find.

I spent some time digging, and while I remain cautious about the legitimacy of the text, I think it offers a true transcription of a petition created by descendant of the witch trials, and I’ll present the case here.

Inside cover of the Towne family scrapbook reading "Family Papers 1630 to 1890. For Posterity! Handle with care."
  1. Its a weird choice to fake
    Given the other pieces of evidence that I’ll share below, I trust my initial instinct is that this is a weird choice of document to create for some ulterior motive in the nineteenth century. Why a copy of a petition from nearly 50 years after 1692 the for your family scrapbook and not a document more related to the actual witch trials? Why include so many transcription second guesses and quirks? The books are filled with documents from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and only one related to the witch trials on clearly newer paper labeled “Copy”. Its obviously not original and not like the other documents so its a strange effort to fake in a family scrapbook. This is a not-so-historical or scientific rationale, but Edward Towne wrote “For Posterity!” on the inside cover and otherwise took great care to present centuries of family history. Is this tangential document to 1692 really how he’d sneak in a piece of fiction?

  2. Timing
    The text of the document fits perfectly into the timeline of Massachusetts legislative efforts to pay restitution for the witch trials. In December 1738, the House of Representatives voted “That Major Sewall, Mr. Fairfield, Mr. Norton, and Mr. Danforth, be a Committee to get the best Information they can into the Circumstances of the Persons and Families who suffered in the Calamity of the Times in or about the Year 1692, and have not received any Restitution or Reparation for their Losses and Misfortunes, that the Committee lay the same before the Court as soon as may be.” The John Wildes petition addressed to a committee seeking restitution is dated just a few months later on May 28, 1739. The date coincides with the start of the a legislative session on May 30, 1739. There are few records about the Committee even forming, let alone their business, but a couple months to start up and ]for descendants to prepare materials is a reasonable timeline.

  3. John’s word choices
    I think John Wildes took inspiration from Rev. Israel Loring’s 1737 election day sermon given before the House of Representatives. It is also likely that any political movements led by descendants used the language first and Loring took inspiration from them. Either way, in this chicken or the egg question, we have both the chicken and the egg to see how Loring and Wildes represent the reparations movement.


    Loring blatantly asked the legislators to consider paying restitution to descendants: “Whether there is not a great Duty lying upon us, respecting the Transactions of the Year 1692, when not only many Persons were taken off by the Hand of publick Justice for the supposed Crime of Witchcraft; but their Estates also ruined, and their Families impoverished…Now tho’ the loss of Parents cannot be made up to their surviving Posterity, yet their Estates may; And the Question is (if it be not beyond all Question) whether a Restitution is not due from the Publick to them…Hereby Infamy may be taken off from the Names and Memory of such as were Executed, and who it may be did not in the least deserve it.”

    Maybe John read a copy of the sermon two years later while preparing his petition or perhaps Loring and Wildes both represent a broader trend, but the 1739 petition fits in with this phrasing. Loring refers to repairing the estates of victims and removing the infamy of the names and memories of the accused suspects. Both points appear in the Wildes petition. John asked about “cause to (take?) off the scandal in some measure and also make (restitution or Restoration?) as to damages in my predecessors estate at that time.” If John parroted the talking points of a printed sermon or Loring conveyed the arguments of a movement, either case explains why the petition refers to Sarah Wildes’ estate which would have been an inaccurate description of her property at the time of her execution.

  4. The Towne family’s genealogy
    The scrapbook by Edward Stone Towne covers a long period of the family’s history and while link the Wildes family is not immediately clear since the petition is the only overt reference to the surname, the petition and scrapbook seem disconnected. However, The Descendants of William Towne clears up the mystery for why Edward had a copy of a 1739 petition regarding Sarah Wildes’ estate. Edward’s father Ezra (1807-1899) is the son of Jacob (1768-1736) who is the son of Jacob (1728-1768) who is the son of Benjamin (1691-1782) and Susannah Towne.  Susannah is the daughter of Ephraim and Mary (Howlett) Wildes and therefore the sister of John Wildes and Sarah’s granddaughter.  Although Susannah died in 1736, years before John wrote the petition, the link between the Townes and Wildes families is clearly established.   The petition possibly changed hands on the family line or Edward (or another Towne) copied it from the Wildes side of their family and passed the transcript down. It isn’t a stretch to see why the scrapbook contains such a document.  There are a couple other marriages between the Wildes and Towne families over the two-hundred years between the witch trials and the creation of the scrapbook.  The link to Susannah is just the most direct between Edward and John Wildes although the petition (and/or copies) may have travelled along other lines, but nevertheless, it has some degree of provenance.


    There are several other indications that the text of the document is legitimate, but I want to move on and address the prior reparations given to the Wildes family and why this petition matters.  In 1710, Sarah’s son Ephraim filed a petition for £20 and received £14.  Other families did received more: according to one order of payment, George Jacobs Sr.’s family received £79, Geoge Burroughs’ family received £50, and John Procter’s family and Elizabeth Procter received £150.  Yes, the £100 requested by John Wildes is comparatively high.  As a grandson rather than a child of a victim and as a member of a family that already received payment, his petition might have been a longshot. There are no similar records for this committee’s work and the payments sought by other families or the success of those 1730s petitions so we can’t tell much based on the amount requested. Maybe it wasn’t considered unusual for this committee.  Maybe John figured he’d give it a try, maybe it was greed, or maybe or maybe his family did still ache from the trauma of the witch trials even nearly fifty years later.  We don’t know, but I think Ephraim’s petition helps make sense of it.

    Ephraim began by mentioning the fees his family had to pay for his mother’s time in both the Salem and Boston jails, but he went on to a more emotional cost.

Besides either my father or myself went once a week to see how she did and what she wanted and sometimes twice a week which was a great cost and damage to our estate. My father would often say that the cost and damage we sustained in our estate was twenty pounds and I am in the mind he spoke less than it was: besides the loss of so dear a friend which cannot be made up.

John Wildes was two years old when his grandmother hanged for witchcraft.  His father finally received restitution when John was twenty-one years old.  He spent his entire childhood with Sarah’s death in the background and his father persisting in a quest for compensation.  Whatever stories Ephraim or his grandfather John told about Sarah and their visits to the prison, whatever accounts of the trials, and whatever frustrations they vented in the battle for reparations, the pain of the witch trials’ legacy surrounded John for decades.  When the opportunity arose later to fight the damages done to his family by the witchcraft accusations, why wouldn’t John leap at the chance?  When he wrote “my great concern is the guilt of innocent blood may not rest on our land” he eschewed the monetary compensations and instead leaned on the narratives of the injustices that he watched his father fight and win in some small part. Nothing could replace the loss of a wife, a mother, a grandmother, a dear friend like Sarah. The trauma of the witch trials lingered over John and his family so much that forty-seven years later, the Wildes family continued to seek justice.

This is not the original document, and maybe now with the text uncovered the source may be located by revealing some way to look for it.  Whether an archive’s catalog just lists “Wildes, John” or “1730s legislative petitions,” there are possibilities. Maybe someone else out there has seen this document before and it isn’t online or someone will spot it someday.  In any case, it appears that the text of this document has never before been connected to any of the efforts to transcribe the Salem Witch Trials court records and it offers something new about the personal tolls afflicted on the families of the victims. There aren’t many petitions like this one that survived in any form, and less so after the 1710-12 restitution process. The committee’s work in the 1730s must have yielded dozens of similar sources that no longer exist or are yet to be associated with the Salem records. Even as this petition is merely the text of a document and not the document itself, it is a new Salem Witch Trials document.




My best effort at transcribing the entire document:

Copy)

I the subscriber being a grandchild

 and descendant of Sarah Wildes the wife of

John Wildes of Topsfield who suffered death by

setence of the execution               in the dark and

distressing times in the year 1692 for altho she

was a woman of an unspotted character and

good conversation conversion in the sight of all that were

acquainted with her yet by that influence with

the [illegible] of the brethren (and? or how) upon some poor deluded blooded

creatures who testifieth that such and such persons

afflicted them by their spectres which persons could as well

accuse such as they never saw in their lives as they

they could them that they were well acquainted with

notwithstanding by these and and such like evidences

principally many persons precious lives was taken away and

much blood was shed together with our pious relative

under pretense of their being guilty of the horrid sin

of Witchcraft- Gentlemen of the Committee I think to

represent to the General Court that the estate of my

predecessors [=demised?] is at least are one hundred pounds) in

rules of the old tener?) and of our receiving any (restitution? in time

past if there was any I know it not             the repairing the estate

taken away although it was done to the full value are but

the lesser matters of law               my great great concern

[Reverse] is that the guilt of innocent blood may not

rest on our land  I would be very far from

reflecting on those worthy men which then sate

in the seat of judgement but it tis (too or so?) plain

for any to deny but that they were strangely

misguided in that dark time so gentlemen

of the Committee I rest the whole of the difficulties

above (named or mentioned?) with you hoping you will give it due weight

in having a (very?) deep thought upon them dark and

sorrowful times so as the great and general Court

may may see cause to (take?) off the scandal in

some measure and also may (restitution or Restoration?) as to

damages in my predecessors estate at that time

so gentlemen I am yours to serve who am in

duty bound shall every pray

Dated May ye 28 day 1739- John Wildes

[Reverse left margin: Copy- Pet. Of John Wildes 1739-]



Thanks to Emerson Baker and Margo Burns for their comments on the document as well as the Phillips Library archivists and staff!